i.5Wiki
Agentic AI Atlas · sanyuan0704/sanyuan-skills
docs/reference-repos/sanyuan0704/sanyuan-skills/researcha5c.ai
I.
Wiki article

docs/reference-repos/sanyuan0704/sanyuan-skills/research

Reading · 2 min

sanyuan0704/sanyuan-skills reference

Page nodewiki/docs/reference-repos/sanyuan0704/sanyuan-skills/research.mdNearby pages · 0Documents · 0

sanyuan0704/sanyuan-skills

Metadata

  • **Full name**: sanyuan0704/sanyuan-skills
  • **Description**: Expert code review skill: SOLID, security, performance, error handling, boundary conditions
  • **Stars**: 3,181
  • **License**: MIT
  • **Last pushed**: 2026-03-02
  • **Topics**: (none)

Structure

Code
skills/
  code-review-expert/    # Main value
    SKILL.md
    agents/
    references/
      solid-checklist.md
      removal-plan.md
      security-checklist.md
      code-quality-checklist.md
  sigma/                 # Bloom's 2-Sigma mastery learning tutor
    SKILL.md
  skill-forge/           # Meta-skill for creating skills
    SKILL.md

Classification

code-review-expert -> Process candidate: specializations/shared/code-review-expert

**Archetype**: Structured code review methodology with severity-based triage.

**Extractable value**:

  • 4-severity classification system (P0-P3) with clear action thresholds (block merge / should fix / follow-up / optional)
  • 5-phase review workflow: preflight context -> SOLID analysis -> removal candidates -> security scan -> code quality scan
  • Reference checklists for SOLID violations, security risks, code quality issues
  • Edge case handling: empty diffs, large diffs (>500 lines batching), mixed concerns grouping
  • Structured output format with file:line references

**Why specializations/shared (not methodologies/)**: This is a domain-specific review protocol, not a full generic dev methodology. It's cross-domain (applies to any codebase) so it goes in shared/.

**Process extraction notes**:

  • The severity system maps well to babysitter breakpoints (P0 = blocking breakpoint, P1 = should-fix breakpoint, P2-P3 = informational)
  • Review phases map to sequential tasks in a babysitter process
  • Reference checklists could be bundled as process inputs or embedded in task definitions

sigma -> SKIP

Tutoring/learning skill. Not a dev methodology or plugin idea.

skill-forge -> SKIP

Meta-skill for creating skills. SDK-covered primitive (skill management).

Plugin Ideas

None. The code review skill is better modeled as a process.

Library Mapping

Extractable ProcessLibrary StatusActionExisting PathTarget Placement
Code Review ExpertNEW4-severity classification system (P0-P3) with 5-phase review workflow-specializations/shared/code-review-expert.js
SOLID Analysis ProcessNEWSystematic SOLID principles violation detection and severity assignment-specializations/shared/solid-analysis.js
Security-Focused Code ReviewNEWSecurity vulnerability scanning with severity classification-specializations/shared/security-code-review.js

Plugin Marketplace Mapping

Plugin IdeaMarketplace StatusActionExisting PluginTarget Placement
N/AN/ANo valid plugin ideas - processes cover the extractable value-N/A

Summary

One extractable process: **code-review-expert** -> specializations/shared/code-review-expert. Clean severity-based code review methodology with SOLID, security, and quality checklists. Good structure, well-scoped phases that map naturally to babysitter tasks.