Agentic AI Atlasby a5c.ai
OverviewWikiGraphFor AgentsEdgesSearchWorkspace
/
GitHubDocsDiscord
iiRecord
Agentic AI Atlas · BDD/Specification by Example (Library)
page:library-bdd-specification-by-examplea5c.ai
Search record views/
Record · tabs

Available views

II.Record viewspp. 1 - 1
overviewarticlejsongraph
III.Related pagespp. 1 - 1
II.
Page reference

page:library-bdd-specification-by-example

Reading · 10 min

BDD/Specification by Example (Library) reference

Behavior-Driven Development (BDD), also known as Specification by Example, is a collaborative approach that captures requirements as concrete examples illustrating how the system should behave in specific scenarios. These examples become executable specifications that serve as both documentation and automated tests.

Pagewiki/library/bdd-specification-by-example.mdOutgoing · 1Incoming · 1

BDD/Specification by Example

Overview

Behavior-Driven Development (BDD), also known as Specification by Example, is a collaborative approach that captures requirements as concrete examples illustrating how the system should behave in specific scenarios. These examples become executable specifications that serve as both documentation and automated tests.

**Creators**: Dan North (BDD, 2006), Gojko Adzic (Specification by Example)

Key Principles

  • **Shared Understanding**: Business and development teams use the same words
  • **Outside-In Development**: Start with what users see and experience
  • **Living Documentation**: Requirements stay current because they're also tests
  • **Three-Step Process**: Discovery → Formulation → Automation
  • **Concrete Examples**: Abstract requirements illustrated with specific scenarios
  • **Executable Specifications**: Tests that verify behavior

Methodology

Three-Step Iterative Process

1. Discovery

Collaborative exploration using Example Mapping to:

  • Identify business rules
  • Generate concrete examples
  • Capture questions and edge cases
  • Validate scope
  • Build shared understanding

2. Formulation

Convert examples to structured Gherkin scenarios:

  • Given-When-Then format
  • Declarative language
  • Scenario outlines for data-driven tests
  • Reusable steps
  • Clear tags and organization

3. Automation

Implement executable specifications:

  • Step definitions
  • Test automation
  • Page object patterns
  • Test data management
  • Continuous execution

Process Workflow

Code
Discovery Workshop
    ↓
[Review Examples & Rules]
    ↓
Gherkin Formulation
    ↓
[Review Scenarios]
    ↓
Step Definition Generation
    ↓
[Review Steps]
    ↓
Test Automation
    ↓
Living Documentation
    ↓
[Final Review]

Usage

Basic Usage

javascript
import { runProcess } from '@a5c-ai/babysitter-sdk';

const result = await runProcess('methodologies/bdd-specification-by-example', {
  projectName: 'E-commerce Platform',
  feature: 'Shopping cart checkout process',
  stakeholders: ['Product Owner', 'Developer', 'QA', 'UX Designer'],
  testFramework: 'cucumber',
  generateTests: true,
  createDocumentation: true
});

Input Parameters

ParameterTypeRequiredDefaultDescription
projectNamestringYes-Project name
featurestringYes-Feature to analyze
stakeholdersarrayNo['Product Owner', 'Developer', 'QA']Stakeholder roles
testFrameworkstringNo'cucumber'cucumber, specflow, behave, cypress
developmentPhasestringNo'greenfield'greenfield or brownfield
generateTestsbooleanNotrueAuto-generate test automation
createDocumentationbooleanNotrueGenerate living documentation
existingFeaturesarrayNo[]Existing feature context
existingScenariosarrayNo[]Existing scenarios to consider
existingStepsarrayNo[]Existing step definitions library

Output Structure

javascript
{
  success: boolean,
  projectName: string,
  feature: string,
  discovery: {
    story: { title, description, businessValue, acceptanceCriteria },
    rules: [{ id, description, rationale }],
    examples: [{ id, ruleId, title, context, action, outcome, type }],
    questions: [{ id, question, answer, priority }],
    scope: { inScope, outOfScope }
  },
  gherkin: {
    featureFile: string,
    scenarios: [{ id, title, type, tags, given, when, then, examples }],
    totalSteps: number,
    uniqueSteps: [{ text, type, usageCount }]
  },
  scenarioAnalysis: {
    qualityScore: number,
    issues: [],
    recommendations: [],
    coverage: { examplesCovered, examplesTotal, coveragePercentage }
  },
  stepDefinitions: {
    stepDefinitionsCode: string,
    steps: [{ id, text, type, regex, functionName, parameters, complexity }],
    newSteps: number,
    reusedSteps: number
  },
  automation: {
    stepImplementations: [],
    testData: { testData, fixtures, factories },
    execution: { total, passed, failed, pending, results }
  },
  documentation: {
    featureDocumentation: string,
    coverageReport: {},
    behaviorCatalog: [],
    traceability: {}
  },
  artifacts: {
    discovery: 'artifacts/bdd/discovery/',
    features: 'artifacts/bdd/features/',
    stepDefinitions: 'artifacts/bdd/step-definitions/',
    automation: 'artifacts/bdd/automation/',
    documentation: 'artifacts/bdd/docs/'
  }
}

Examples

Example 1: E-commerce Checkout

javascript
const result = await runProcess('methodologies/bdd-specification-by-example', {
  projectName: 'ShopNow',
  feature: 'Guest checkout with multiple payment methods',
  stakeholders: ['Product Manager', 'Developer', 'QA', 'Payment Team'],
  testFramework: 'cucumber',
  developmentPhase: 'brownfield',
  existingFeatures: ['user-authentication', 'shopping-cart']
});

**Discovery Output**:

  • 8 business rules identified
  • 15 concrete examples (happy path, edge cases, errors)
  • 3 questions clarified
  • Clear scope boundaries

**Gherkin Output**:

  • 15 scenarios (12 scenarios + 3 scenario outlines)
  • 45 total steps, 22 unique steps
  • Quality score: 92/100
  • Tags: @checkout, @payment, @guest, @smoke, @regression

**Automation Output**:

  • 22 step definitions (15 new, 7 reused)
  • 3 page objects created
  • Test execution: 15/15 passing
  • Living documentation generated

Example 2: User Registration

javascript
const result = await runProcess('methodologies/bdd-specification-by-example', {
  projectName: 'SocialApp',
  feature: 'User registration with email verification',
  testFramework: 'cypress',
  generateTests: true,
  createDocumentation: true
});

**Discovery Output**:

  • 5 business rules
  • 12 examples covering various scenarios
  • Email validation rules
  • Password strength requirements
  • Rate limiting behavior

**Gherkin Output**:

gherkin
Feature: User Registration
  As a new user
  I want to create an account
  So that I can access the platform

  Background:
    Given the registration page is displayed
    And no user is currently logged in

  Scenario: Successful registration with valid details
    Given I am on the registration page
    When I enter valid email "user@example.com"
    And I enter strong password "SecurePass123!"
    And I confirm the password
    And I accept terms and conditions
    And I click register button
    Then I should see "Verification email sent"
    And I should receive a verification email
    And my account should be created in pending state

  Scenario Outline: Registration fails with invalid email
    Given I am on the registration page
    When I enter email "<email>"
    And I enter valid password details
    And I click register button
    Then I should see error "<error>"
    And my account should not be created

    Examples:
      | email              | error                    |
      | invalid.email      | Invalid email format     |
      | user@              | Invalid email format     |
      | @example.com       | Invalid email format     |
      | existing@email.com | Email already registered |

Example 3: API Feature

javascript
const result = await runProcess('methodologies/bdd-specification-by-example', {
  projectName: 'Payment API',
  feature: 'Process refund with validation',
  testFramework: 'cucumber',
  stakeholders: ['API Developer', 'QA', 'Business Analyst'],
  generateTests: true
});

**Discovery Output**:

  • API contract rules
  • Validation scenarios
  • Error handling examples
  • Idempotency requirements

Tasks

Discovery Workshop Task

**Purpose**: Collaborative exploration using Example Mapping **Output**: Stories, rules, examples, questions, scope **Approach**: Multi-stakeholder perspective, concrete examples

Clarify Questions Task

**Purpose**: Address open questions from discovery **Output**: Answers, additional examples, assumptions **Approach**: Domain expertise, consistency checking

Gherkin Formulation Task

**Purpose**: Convert examples to Given-When-Then scenarios **Output**: Feature files, scenarios, step inventory **Approach**: Declarative language, reusable steps, best practices

Analyze Scenario Quality Task

**Purpose**: Assess scenario quality and coverage **Output**: Quality score, issues, recommendations **Approach**: Best practices validation, coverage analysis

Step Definition Task

**Purpose**: Generate step definition stubs **Output**: Step definitions code, regex patterns **Approach**: Framework-specific conventions, reusability

Analyze Step Reuse Task

**Purpose**: Identify reusable steps and duplicates **Output**: Reuse metrics, recommendations **Approach**: Pattern matching, consolidation opportunities

Implement Step Task

**Purpose**: Implement step with working code **Output**: Implementation code, page objects, helpers **Approach**: Testing patterns, error handling, idempotency

Generate Test Data Task

**Purpose**: Create test data and fixtures **Output**: Test data sets, fixtures, factories **Approach**: Realistic data, boundary values, privacy

Execute Tests Task

**Purpose**: Run automated tests **Output**: Execution results, pass/fail metrics **Approach**: Framework execution, result analysis

Generate Living Documentation Task

**Purpose**: Create feature documentation from scenarios **Output**: Feature docs, coverage report, behavior catalog **Approach**: Stakeholder-readable, test-linked, visual

Generate Traceability Task

**Purpose**: Link requirements to scenarios to tests **Output**: Traceability matrix, coverage gaps **Approach**: Bidirectional mapping, gap analysis

Integration Points

With Spec-Driven Development

BDD provides detailed acceptance criteria that complement spec-driven development:

javascript
// First: Create specification
const spec = await runProcess('methodologies/spec-driven-development', { ... });

// Then: Add BDD scenarios for each user story
for (const story of spec.specification.userStories) {
  const bdd = await runProcess('methodologies/bdd-specification-by-example', {
    feature: story.title,
    stakeholders: ['Product Owner', 'Developer', 'QA']
  });
}

With Example Mapping

Use Example Mapping methodology for discovery phase:

javascript
// Example Mapping workshop
const mapping = await runProcess('methodologies/example-mapping', { ... });

// Convert to BDD scenarios
const bdd = await runProcess('methodologies/bdd-specification-by-example', {
  feature: mapping.story,
  existingExamples: mapping.examples
});

With ATDD/TDD

BDD scenarios drive test-driven development:

javascript
const bdd = await runProcess('methodologies/bdd-specification-by-example', {
  generateTests: true
});

// Use scenarios for ATDD
const atdd = await runProcess('methodologies/atdd', {
  acceptanceCriteria: bdd.gherkin.scenarios
});

Best Practices

Discovery Workshop

1. Include diverse stakeholders (business, dev, QA, UX) 2. Use Example Mapping format (story, rules, examples, questions) 3. Focus on concrete examples, not abstract requirements 4. Identify edge cases and error scenarios 5. Time-box discussions (15-25 minutes per story) 6. Capture questions immediately

Gherkin Writing

1. Use declarative language (what, not how) 2. Write scenarios from user perspective 3. Keep scenarios independent and isolated 4. One scenario = one behavior 5. Use scenario outlines for data-driven tests 6. Tag appropriately (@smoke, @regression, @slow) 7. Make scenarios readable by non-technical stakeholders

Step Definitions

1. Create reusable, focused steps 2. Use regex for parameter capture 3. Follow Page Object Model pattern 4. Keep step implementations simple 5. Extract complex logic to helper functions 6. Make steps idempotent 7. Add meaningful assertion messages

Test Automation

1. Run tests frequently (CI/CD) 2. Keep tests fast and reliable 3. Isolate test data 4. Clean up after tests 5. Handle async operations properly 6. Make tests deterministic 7. Monitor for flaky tests

Living Documentation

1. Keep documentation in sync with tests 2. Make it accessible to all stakeholders 3. Include visual diagrams 4. Link to test results 5. Highlight test status 6. Update automatically 7. Version with code

Test Frameworks

Cucumber (JavaScript/TypeScript)

javascript
const result = await runProcess('methodologies/bdd-specification-by-example', {
  testFramework: 'cucumber',
  // Generates .feature files and .js step definitions
});

SpecFlow (.NET/C#)

javascript
const result = await runProcess('methodologies/bdd-specification-by-example', {
  testFramework: 'specflow',
  // Generates .feature files and .cs step definitions
});

Behave (Python)

javascript
const result = await runProcess('methodologies/bdd-specification-by-example', {
  testFramework: 'behave',
  // Generates .feature files and .py step definitions
});

Cypress (JavaScript)

javascript
const result = await runProcess('methodologies/bdd-specification-by-example', {
  testFramework: 'cypress',
  // Generates .feature files and cypress test specs
});

Common Patterns

Outside-In Development

Start with acceptance tests (outside) and work inward: 1. Write feature/scenario (acceptance test) 2. Run test (red) 3. Write unit tests for components (TDD) 4. Implement components 5. Integration 6. Acceptance test passes (green)

Example Mapping Workshop

Visual collaborative technique:

  • Story (yellow card)
  • Rules (blue cards)
  • Examples (green cards)
  • Questions (red cards)

Scenario Structure

gherkin
Scenario: <Clear, concise title from user perspective>
  Given <Context/Preconditions>
  And <More context>
  When <Action/Event>
  And <More actions>
  Then <Expected outcome>
  And <More expectations>

Scenario Outline Pattern

gherkin
Scenario Outline: <Title with parameters>
  Given <context with <parameter>>
  When <action with <parameter>>
  Then <outcome with <parameter>>

  Examples:
    | parameter | expected |
    | value1    | result1  |
    | value2    | result2  |

Quality Metrics

The process tracks quality metrics:

  • **Scenario Quality Score**: 0-100 based on best practices
  • **Example Coverage**: % of discovery examples covered by scenarios
  • **Step Reusability**: % of steps reused vs. total steps
  • **Test Success Rate**: % of passing scenarios
  • **Traceability Completeness**: % of rules linked to tested scenarios
  • **Documentation Freshness**: Last update vs. code changes

Artifacts Generated

Discovery Phase

  • artifacts/bdd/discovery/example-map.md - Visual example map
  • artifacts/bdd/discovery/rules.json - Business rules
  • artifacts/bdd/discovery/questions.json - Questions and answers

Formulation Phase

  • artifacts/bdd/features/feature.feature - Gherkin feature file
  • artifacts/bdd/analysis/scenario-quality.md - Quality analysis

Automation Phase

  • artifacts/bdd/step-definitions/steps.* - Step definitions
  • artifacts/bdd/automation/page-objects/ - Page object models
  • artifacts/bdd/automation/test-data/ - Test data and fixtures
  • artifacts/bdd/automation/test-report.html - Test execution report

Documentation Phase

  • artifacts/bdd/docs/feature-documentation.md - Living documentation
  • artifacts/bdd/docs/traceability-matrix.md - Requirements traceability
  • artifacts/bdd/docs/coverage-report.md - Test coverage analysis

References

Official Resources

  • Cucumber BDD Guide
  • Cucumber Documentation
  • SpecFlow Documentation
  • Behave Documentation

Books

  • **"Specification by Example"** by Gojko Adzic
  • **"The Cucumber Book"** by Matt Wynne & Aslak Hellesoy
  • **"BDD in Action"** by John Ferguson Smart
  • **"Discovery: Explore behaviour using examples"** by Gáspár Nagy & Seb Rose

Articles & Guides

  • BDD on Wikipedia
  • Monday.com BDD Guide 2026
  • BrainHub BDD 2025
  • Dan North's Blog - Introducing BDD
  • Gojko Adzic - Specification by Example

Tools

  • Cucumber - BDD framework for multiple languages
  • SpecFlow - BDD for .NET
  • Behave - BDD for Python
  • Cypress Cucumber Preprocessor - Gherkin for Cypress
  • Example Mapping - Discovery workshop technique

Troubleshooting

Low Quality Score

  • Review scenario independence
  • Check for imperative language
  • Ensure proper Given-When-Then structure
  • Verify stakeholder readability

Poor Step Reusability

  • Make steps more generic
  • Extract common patterns
  • Use proper parameterization
  • Review step naming conventions

Failing Tests

  • Check test data validity
  • Verify environment setup
  • Review async handling
  • Check for test dependencies

Documentation Out of Sync

  • Run documentation generation after changes
  • Set up automated regeneration
  • Review CI/CD integration
  • Check artifact paths

License

Part of the Babysitter SDK orchestration framework.

Article source

The article body is owned directly by this record.

Related pages

No related wiki pages for this record.

Shortcuts

Open overview
Open JSON
Open graph