iiRecord
Agentic AI Atlas · awesome-skills/code-review-skill
page:docs-reference-repos-awesome-skills-code-review-skill-researcha5c.ai
II.
Page reference

page:docs-reference-repos-awesome-skills-code-review-skill-research

Reading · 2 min

awesome-skills/code-review-skill reference

Cross-domain, language-aware code review methodology with:

Pagewiki/docs/reference-repos/awesome-skills/code-review-skill/research.mdOutgoing · 0Incoming · 1

awesome-skills/code-review-skill

Metadata

  • **Stars:** 263
  • **License:** MIT
  • **Last pushed:** 2026-03-01
  • **Description:** A comprehensive code review skill for Claude Code, covering React 19, Vue 3, Rust, TypeScript, TanStack Query v5, and more.

Archetype: Specialization Process (code-review domain)

Structure

  • SKILL.md — Main skill definition with phased review methodology
  • reference/ — 16 language/framework-specific review guides (react.md, vue.md, rust.md, typescript.md, python.md, java.md, go.md, c.md, cpp.md, css-less-sass.md, qt.md, architecture-review-guide.md, performance-review-guide.md, common-bugs-checklist.md, security-review-guide.md, code-review-best-practices.md)
  • assets/ — PR review templates and checklists
  • scripts/ — Supporting automation

Extractable Value

As a Babysitter Process: `specializations/shared/code-review-excellence`

Cross-domain, language-aware code review methodology with: 1. **4-phase structured review process** — Context Gathering (2-3 min) -> High-Level Review (5-10 min) -> Line-by-Line Review (10-20 min) -> Summary & Decision (2-3 min) 2. **Severity labeling system** — blocking / important / nit / suggestion / learning / praise 3. **Question-based feedback technique** — Asks "What happens if..." instead of declaring "This is wrong" 4. **Language-specific deep guides** — 11 languages/frameworks with anti-patterns, common bugs, and best practices per language 5. **Cross-cutting review guides** — Architecture, performance, security, and common bugs checklists

Key Differentiators from Existing

  • The phased time-boxed approach is a concrete methodology (not just a checklist)
  • Language-specific reference guides are modular and composable
  • Severity labeling system is well-defined and actionable
  • Emphasis on "educational, not judgmental" feedback aligns with collaborative review culture

Plugin Idea: `code-review-excellence`

install.md-driven plugin that provides:

  • The SKILL.md as a skill
  • Language-specific reference files as context
  • Hook into pre-commit or PR review workflows

Library Mapping

Extractable ProcessLibrary StatusActionExisting PathTarget Placement
4-Phase Code Review ProcessNEWStructured time-boxed review methodology with severity labeling-specializations/shared/code-review-excellence.js
Language-Specific Review FrameworkNEWModular review guides for 11 languages/frameworks with anti-patterns-specializations/shared/language-specific-review.js
Educational Feedback TechniqueNEWQuestion-based code review methodology emphasizing learning over judgment-specializations/shared/educational-feedback.js
Cross-Cutting Review ProcessNEWArchitecture, performance, and security review checklists-specializations/shared/cross-cutting-review.js

Plugin Marketplace Mapping

Plugin IdeaMarketplace StatusActionExisting PluginTarget Placement
Code Review ExcellenceNEWMulti-language code review setup with phased methodology and hooks-plugins/a5c/marketplace/plugins/code-review-excellence/

Classification Rationale

This is a cross-domain specialization (not a full dev methodology). The review process is applicable to any language/framework, so it fits in specializations/shared/. The language-specific guides are modular reference material.